Compare plan limits and their consequences
Compare plans through units the buyer can understand: active workspaces, approval stages and the event that requires another option. Keep the fourth-workspace example beside the stated limit. The larger-account route should handle a real requirement, while price and commitment wording must come from approved commercial terms.
Worked example — illustrative data.
| Decision attribute | Team plan specimen | Larger-account route |
|---|---|---|
| Active workspaces | Up to 3; confirm commercial limit | Discuss required workspace structure |
| Upgrade trigger | A fourth active workspace | Explain the next available option |
| Approval workflow | One approval stage | Confirm multi-stage requirement |
| Price and commitment | Owner-approved terms required | Written scope and terms required |
Choose comparison rows from the questions buyers use to decide, then write each row with the same unit across plans. Explain whether a limit concerns active records, users or monthly actions. Put a concrete upgrade example beside the limit: a team adding a fourth workspace must know whether work stops, an upgrade is offered or another rule applies. Use only approved commercial wording for billing, renewal and cancellation.
Decision: Keep the comparison short enough to scan and link detailed conditions beside affected rows. Do not publish the fictional plan limits as an actual product offer.
A feature checkmark can hide role or configuration limits: A feature can be technically present but unsuitable for a buyer’s security or workflow requirement. Avoid a simple checkmark when configuration, access role or another condition materially changes availability.
Continue with Guides for stores, software teams and local businesses, SaaS website design and development and Should your SaaS website lead with a demo or a free trial?.